Shop workers at risk without Covid rules, Usdaw warns

Trade union Usdaw has claimed that plans to scrap Covid-19 rules could expose shop workers to infection and abuse.

From July 19, virtually all legal restrictions in England will be lifted.

General secretary Paddy Lillis argued there was “no reason” for the government to relax social distancing or mask laws.

“Many retail workers are at a greater risk of catching the virus and bringing it home to their families,” he said.

READ MORE: High street could ‘collapse’ over summer, Usdaw warns

“Wearing a face covering in crowded public areas like shops is not merely a personal choice, it is an important measure to help protect workers.”

A study last year found that supermarket staff with “customer-facing” roles were five times more likely to catch Covid-19 than their colleagues.

Although shops can introduce their own restrictions, Lillis said the lack of legal backing would put employees at risk.

“Shop workers already face violence and abuse when enforcing these measures,” he continued.

“We are concerned that, when restrictions no longer have the force of the law behind them, this could result in further abuse, threats and violence.”

According to an Association of Convenience Stores report, Covid-19 regulations were the second most common trigger for assaults in shops.

One business, giving evidence to the Home Affairs select committee, blamed its sevenfold rise in violence to social distancing rules.

The news comes after British Retail Consortium head Helen Dickinson warned last week that easing restrictions could spark abuse and leave staff “in the firing line”.

DiscountersIndependent retailersSupermarketsSymbol Groups

RELATED POSTS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

Menu

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Sign up to our daily newsletter to get all the latest retail tech news and insights direct to your inbox.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.